Monday, March 4, 2013

Apple's iWatch Could Be Super Profitable For Apple - Business Insider

Screenshot from Objectified

Apple designer Jony Ive

?

Apple's iWatch, which is reportedly coming this year, could kill three birds with one stone for Apple.

1. It gives Apple an experimental entry in the wearable computing market which is said to be the next big thing

2. If done well it would kill the Apple-can't-innovate-without-Steve Jobs meme

3. It could be super profitable.

Let's tackle the third one. Bloomberg, citing a Citigroup report, says the global watch industry will do $60 billion in sales this year, with average gross margins of 60 percent.

Apple's iWatch, should it be released, will probably not fit neatly into the watch industry, so these comparisons are probably moot. (The margins on a $54,000 Audemars Piguet watch are probably pretty high, but unrelated to a mini-computer on your wrist.)

However, that doesn't mean we can't take a shot at trying to figure out how much money Apple could make on an iWatch.

In 2010, iSuppli estimated Apple's cost of goods plus manufacturing bill was $45.10 for an iPod Nano. The iPod Nano was the little square iPod with a touch screen. It actually wound up being used as a watch by a lot of people, and perhaps was a preview of an iWatch at Apple.

Apple sold the 8 GB iPod Nano for $149 and the 16 GB iPod Nano for $179. It's always an imperfect science relying on iSuppli for costs since Apple buys in bulk and hammers out special deals. However, using iSuppli as a rough estimate suggests the iPod Nano was super profitable.

We don't know what Apple is planning for the iWatch, but if we use this rough estimate, it's not hard to imagine the margins on an iWatch being quite healthy.

One of the chief concerns for Apple, from an investors' perspective, is the risk of margin collapse. If Apple could get margin on the iWatch like it did on the iPod Nano it would help the company's overall margins significantly.

Compare this to a TV, which many people have been anticipating. As Bloomberg points out, the margin on a TV is much smaller, and the market is much more competitive.

Going with an iWatch could be a more lucrative, innovative move from Apple.

And watch below for everything you need to know about the rumored "iWatch":
?

?

Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/apples-iwatch-could-be-super-profitable-for-apple-2013-3

kevin rose sessions march madness scores doonesbury padma lakshmi daughtry lakers trade

Exercise key to good sleep

Mar. 4, 2013 ? Exercise can affect your sleep. The results of the National Sleep Foundation's 2013 Sleep in America? poll show a compelling association between exercise and better sleep.

"Exercise is great for sleep. For the millions of people who want better sleep, exercise may help," says David Cloud, CEO of the National Sleep Foundation (NSF).

Exercisers say they sleep better

Self-described exercisers report better sleep than self-described non-exercisers even though they say they sleep the same amount each night (6 hours and 51 minutes, average on weeknights). Vigorous, moderate and light*exercisers are significantly more likely to say "I had a good night's sleep" every night or almost every night on work nights than non-exercisers (67%-56% vs. 39%). Also, more than three-fourths of exercisers (76%-83%) say their sleep quality was very good or fairly good in the past two weeks, compared to slightly more than one-half of non-exercisers (56%).

"If you are inactive, adding a 10 minute walk every day could improve your likelihood of a good night's sleep," says Max Hirshkowitz, PhD, poll task force chair. "Making this small change and gradually working your way up to more intense activities like running or swimming could help you sleep better."

"Our poll data certainly find strong relationships between good sleep and exercise," adds Hirshkowitz. "While cause and effect can be tricky, I don't think having good sleep necessarily compels us to exercise. I think it is much more likely that exercising improves sleep. And good sleep is fundamental for good health, productivity, and happiness."

Vigorous exercisers report the best sleep

Vigorous exercisers are almost twice as likely as non-exercisers to report "I had a good night's sleep" every night or almost every night during the week. They also are the least likely to report sleep problems. More than two-thirds of vigorous exercisers say they rarely or never (in the past 2 weeks) had symptoms commonly associated with insomnia, including waking up too early and not being able to get back to sleep (72%) and difficulty falling asleep (69%). In contrast, one-half (50%) of non-exercisers say they woke up during the night and nearly one-fourth (24%) had difficulty falling asleep every night or almost every night.

"Poor sleep might lead to negative health partly because it makes people less inclined to exercise," says Shawn Youngstedt, PhD, poll task force member. "More than one half (57%) of the total sample reported that their activity level will be less than usual after a night of poor sleep. Not exercising and not sleeping becomes a vicious cycle."

Non-exercisers are the sleepiest and have the highest risk for sleep apnea

Non-exercisers tend toward being more excessively sleepy than exercisers. Nearly one-fourth of non-exercisers (24%) qualify as "sleepy" using a standard excessive sleepiness clinical screening measure. This sleepiness level occurs about twice as often than for exercisers (12-15%). Also, about six in ten of non-exercisers (61%) say they rarely or never have a good night's sleep on work nights.

Sleepiness clearly interferes with many non-exercisers' safety and quality of life. One in seven non-exercisers (14%) report having trouble staying awake while driving, eating or engaging in social activity at least once a week in the past two weeks, almost three times the rate of those who exercise (4-6%).

"Sometimes we might feel tired, and that's normal," says Matthew Buman, PhD, poll task force member, "but if excessive sleepiness is your normal state, it warrants a conversation with your doctor. It could be a red flag that something is wrong with your health."

Indeed, non-exercisers have more symptoms of sleep apnea. Sleep apnea is a serious medical condition in which a person stops breathing during sleep. Its symptoms often include tiredness, snoring, and high blood pressure. It also increases the risk for heart disease and stroke. More than four in ten non-exercisers (44%) exhibit a moderate risk of sleep apnea, compared to between one in four and one in five of light exercisers (26%), moderate exercisers (22%) and vigorous exercisers (19%).

"The poll data suggest that the risk of sleep apnea in exercisers is half that of non-exercisers," says Christopher Kline, PhD, poll task force member. "People with sleep apnea are often overweight. Exercise can be part of the treatment."

Less time sitting is associated with better sleep and health

Separate from exercise, spending less time sitting may improve sleep quality and health. Those who sit for less than eight hours per day sitting are significantly more likely to say they have "very good" sleep quality than those who sit for eight hours or more (22%-25% compared to 12%-15%). Furthermore, significantly more of those who spend less than 10 hours per day sitting mention excellent health, compared to those who spend 10 hours or more sitting (25-30% compared to 16%).

"This poll is the first to show that simply spending too much time sitting might negatively affect our sleep quality," says Prof. Marco Tulio de Mello, poll task force member. "In addition to exercise, standing at your desk, getting up for short breaks, and moving around as much as possible are important healthy behaviors to include in our lives."

Exercise at any time of day appears to be good for sleep

Those who report exercising close to bedtime and earlier in the day do not demonstrate a difference in self-reported sleep quality. In fact, for most people exercise at any time seems to be better for sleep than no exercise at all.

This finding contradicts long-standing "sleep hygiene" tips that advise everyone not to exercise close to bedtime. The National Sleep Foundation has amended its sleep recommendations for "normal" sleepers to encourage exercise without any caveat to time of day as long as it's not at the expense of sleep. (However, people with chronic insomnia should continue to restrict late evening and night exercise, if this is part of their treatment regimen.)

"Exercise is beneficial to sleep. It's time to revise global recommendations for improving sleep and put exercise -- any time -- at the top of our list for healthy sleep habits," says Dr. Barbara Phillips, poll task force member.

Healthy Sleep Advice

To improve your sleep, try the following sleep tips:

  • Exercise regularly. Vigorous exercise is best, but even light exercise is better than no activity. Exercise at any time of day, but not at the expense of your sleep.
  • Create an environment that is conducive to sleep that is quiet, dark and cool with a comfortable mattress and pillows.
  • Practice a relaxing bedtime ritual, like a warm bath or listening to calming music.
  • Go to sleep and wake at the same time every day, and avoid spending more time in bed than needed.
  • Use bright light to help manage your "body clock." Avoid bright light in the evening and expose yourself to sunlight in the morning.
  • Use your bedroom only for sleep to strengthen the association between your bed and sleep. It may help to remove work materials, computers and televisions from your bedroom.
  • Save your worries for the daytime. If concerns come to mind, write them in a "worry book" so you can address those issues the next day.
  • If you can't sleep, go into another room and do something relaxing until you feel tired.
  • If you are experiencing excessive daytime sleepiness, snoring, or "stop breathing" episodes in your sleep, contact your health care professional for a sleep apnea screening.

Poll Methodology and Definitions

The 2013 Sleep in America? annual poll was conducted for the National Sleep Foundation by WB&A Market Research, using a sample of 1,000 adults between the ages of 23 and 60. The number of completes needed for both age groups and regions was determined using the most current U.S. Census data from 2010.

The maximum sampling error of the data for the total sample is +/- 3.1 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. The sampling error will vary depending on the sample size and the percentages being examined in the sample.

* Using a self-reported measure of physical activity, for which respondents considered physical activity they did for at least 10 minutes in the past 7 days, participants were classified into four different activity levels: vigorous, moderate, light and no activity. In this self-report measure, vigorous was defined as activities which require hard physical effort such as: running, cycling, swimming or competitive sports. The next level, moderate, was defined as activities which require more effort than normal such as: yoga, tai chi and weight lifting. Light activity was defined as walking, while those who do not do any activity classified themselves into the no activity level. Segments are often referred to as vigorous exercisers, moderate exercisers, light exercisers and non-exercisers based on this measure of self-categorization.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by National Sleep Foundation.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/~3/FnWtk1Rejto/130304123551.htm

did the groundhog see his shadow Ray Lewis Murder UFC 156 my bloody valentine Super Bowl Winners what time does the superbowl start Kaepernick Tattoos

Is There Privacy Or Secrecy In Your Relationship? | Healing ...

secrtblogpictureIn a culture of cell phones, text messages, Facebook, tweets and instagrams, the definitions of privacy and secrecy are challenged and at times blurred.

You read my emails?

I can?t report every move I make in the course of a day.

Why can?t I check out my high school girlfriend on Facebook?

When it comes to relationships, partners often underestimate the importance of privacy and the danger of secrecy.

Privacy in relationships reflects trust and enhances intimacy. Secrecy in relationships impairs trust and impedes intimacy.

What is Privacy?

Privacy is defined as the state or condition of being free from being observed or disturbed by other people. It is the state of being free from public exposure and attention.

Why We Need Privacy As Individuals

Psychologically, we understand that whereas secure attachment is key to early development, the growing capacity of the child to internalize this attachment and to separate?to have room to be, to play alone, to have private thoughts, to have space, to develop an authentic self?is crucial.

Why We Need Privacy In Relationships

As adults we continue to need different degrees of privacy to re-charge, regulate stress and nurture a sense of self?be it a solitary hobby or reading the paper alone.

We also need intimacy. We need to be and share with another, to be known by them in a way that no one else knows us.

Boundary Changes in Relationships

As such, in committed and intimate relationship, our individual boundaries of privacy change. In most cases, we choose to share bedrooms, sex, money, food, pets, chores, vacations, confidences, fears, and hardships? the best and worst of ourselves?with another. We also share a respect for each other?s privacy.

Disclosure Expectations in Relationships

While one partner may be more disclosing than the other, we can?t expect to hear or share every thought, action, urge or memory of our partner. In a trusting relationship, we have neither the need to check each other?s phone, emails, mail or daily moves, nor the obligation to disclose all. If we enjoy such sharing, it is mutual sharing that fuels our connection.

When thinking about privacy in a relationship it is worth considering:

  • A loving relationship has room for two independent people as well as their mutual dependency.
  • When there is no privacy, no separate space, romance wanes, as there is no room for imagination.

We rarely fantasize about someone standing next to us?at all times.

  • When there is no privacy ? to be oneself? in a relationship,partners conform to expectations. Authenticity and creativity become impossible.
  • When private dreams are allowed, they very often become shared possibilities.

When Does Privacy Become Secrecy?

Privacy becomes secrecy when there is conscious motivation to keep something unknown, hidden or unseen from one?s partner?something that directly impacts that person and the bond shared.

  • It is the choice to hide an online relationship with your high school sweetheart.
  • It is withholding the loss of family money due to gambling or a business investment.

Secrets can be motivated by betrayal, shame, fear, or anger. Secrets disqualify intimacy because they prevent authenticity. Psychologically when a partner is holding a secret, a part of them is not available for connection.

Secret Betrayal

  • A striking dynamic in the holding of secrets in relationships is the use of denial. Both men and women who betray their partner by having sex outside of their bonded relationship report the wish to keep the secret relationship apart from their home life. The illusion is that this will not break down their primary relationship.
  • The reality is that not only do most secret affairs become exposed?they rupture the trust and in many cases end the relationship. At the very least, they off-set the expected and predicted sense of trust.?In many ways,?it is a life crisis for both partners.
  • Charles Orlando, author of The Problem with Women?Is Men, tells us that many men report feeling guilt and self-loathing after affairs. Betrayal leaves everyone feeling like a failure.
  • Recovery is only possible if the denial of?secrecy is replaced with the?honesty of openness.

Secret Vigilance

  • Sadly, secrets often breed mistrust and secrecy on the part of the betrayed?partner.
  • Faced with the reality of an affair and even after it has ended, many partners try to protect themselves with secret vigilance that involves checking emails, phone records, and Facebook accounts.
  • Now secrets are matched by secrets. There is no safety because the relationship is now driven by fear of ? not knowing? the partner and the?anticipation of betrayal.
  • Staying in a real way means putting words to the fears?together or with the help of a professional.

Secret Anger

Sometimes there is no betrayal in the relationship, but a partner?s insistence to know all, see all, and hear all is so intrusive and unwarranted that it triggers angry withholding and secrecy in the other. It is an assault of privacy and an insult to fidelity. Driven by his/her history, self-esteem difficulties etc., the intrusive partner has created the very secrecy they fear.

As seen in the?situations of secrecy above, acting out pain, reacting to pain, or trying to get needs met in the shadow of secrecy?never brings forth the bright light of true connection.

As frightening as it seems, it is the risk of verbalizing needs, of balancing privacy and attachment, of confronting the secrets, and?of accepting human frailty that turns strangers back into partners.

?

?

?

?

Suzanne B. Phillips, Psy.D., ABPP is a licensed psychologist. She is Adjunct Professor of Clinical Psychology in the Doctoral Program of Long Island University and on the faculty of the Post-Doctoral Programs of the Derner Institute of Adelphi University. Suzanne Phillips, PsyD and Dianne Kane are the authors of Healing Together: A Couple's Guide to Coping with Trauma and Post-Traumatic Stress. Learn more about their work at couplesaftertrauma.com . Visit Suzanne's Facebook Page HERE.

Like this author?
Catch up on other posts by Suzanne Phillips, Psy.D., ABPP (or subscribe to their feed).



????Last reviewed: 4 Mar 2013

APA Reference
Phillips, S. (2013). Is There Privacy Or Secrecy In Your Relationship?. Psych Central. Retrieved on March 4, 2013, from http://blogs.psychcentral.com/healing-together/2013/03/is-there-privacy-or-secrecy-in-your-relationship/

?

Source: http://blogs.psychcentral.com/healing-together/2013/03/is-there-privacy-or-secrecy-in-your-relationship/

macular degeneration whitney houston funeral judi dench bobby brown leaves funeral donnie mcclurkin whitney houston funeral live stream kevin costner whitney houston

Cell phone radiation standards review - Another sham?

(NaturalNews) Cell phone radiation standards, currently set by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), do not protect the public from the adverse health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted by cell phones. Fact.

The recently published 2012 BioInitiative Report states "bioeffects are clearly established and occur at very low levels of exposure to electromagnetic fields and radiofrequency radiation. This information now argues for thresholds or guidelines that are substantially below current FCC and ICNIPR standards." The report shines the spotlight on the link between exposure to EMFs and Autism, Fetal Exposure, Fertility, Alzheimer's Disease and other neurological and autoimmune disease effects.

After 17 years, which equates to a lifetime with this kind of technology, the FCC is set to review these outmoded and obsolete cell phone radiation standards. The real concern lies in the impact from exposure to non-thermal electromagnetic fields. As far as the FCC is concerned, if there is no heating effect, there is no effect.

Cell phone radiation might not heat but it affects reproductive health, increases the metabolism of glucose by the brain, increases the risk for certain types of cancer, affects brain function, and disrupts normal sleep patterns. These are just a few of the ramifications of using a cell phone, substantiated by the findings of thousands of research studies. The public expects, and deserves to be protected.

These findings do not even address the harsh reality of what is being thrust upon the younger generation. Children are being exposed to the same risks as adults, risks which are only exacerbated due to their thinner skulls, greater tissue conductivity and smaller heads. The FCC is known for its pro telecom industry stance, but this is not the case for other government bodies.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, "Exposure and Testing Requirements for Mobile Phones Should Be Reassessed," is very telling. The GAO states, "The FCC's current RF (radio frequency) energy exposure limit for mobile phones "may not reflect the latest evidence" and "may impose additional costs on manufacturers and limitations on mobile phone design." This comes after the World Health Organization (WHO) classified radiation from devices like cell phones and WiFi as a 'Possible Human Carcinogen' (Class 2B).Someone not afraid to speak out on the dangers of cell phones is Dr. Sanjay Gupta, a respected neurosurgeon and the chief medical correspondent for CNN. Gupta has examined the research and recommends:

? Never hold the phone up to your head - always use a wired earpiece
? No phones for kids
? Avoid making calls when connections are compromised. More radiation is emitted during these times.

Joel Moskowitz from the School of Public Health at Berkeley recommends the FCC:

? Form a panel of professional experts who have no ties to the industry
? Empower the panel to come up with acceptable standards that protect the general public
? Implement these standards

All good advice. Renee Sharp, one of the Environmental Working Group's directors, hopes the FCC can hear this kind of information and comments "the FCC has been wearing a blindfold for more than a decade, pretending that while cell phones were revolutionizing how we communicate; the agency didn't have to take a hard look at what this meant for its so-called safety standards."

Will the FCC once again just succumb to the lobbying efforts of the telecommunications industry or seriously consider these recommendations?

Sources for this article include:

http://www.prlog.org
http://bgr.com/2012/06/15/cell-phone-radiation-fcc-review/
http://www.lexology.com
http://saferemr.com/

About the author:
Lloyd Burrell is the author of a new ebook entitled "How To Beat Electrical Sensitivity" which offers a solution to the growing number of people whose health is being compromised by exposure to wireless and similar technologies, see www.electricsense.com/3-free-chapters.html

Since falling prey to a violent reaction to his cell phone in 2002 he has spent the last 10 years researching the effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) on health. He now offers a complete solution on how to live a healthy life in our increasingly electromagnetic world.

You can download his free EMF Health Report and subscribe to his newsletter by visiting his website http://www.electricsense.com/. You can also follow him on Facebook , Twitter and Youtube.

Popular on Natural News

Have comments on this article? Post them here:

?people have commented on this article.

Source: http://www.naturalnews.com/039322_cell_phone_radiation_government_standards.html

Melky Cabrera Mayim Bialik Rich Kids of Instagram felix hernandez julia child Ron Palillo Chad Johnson Twitter

Sunday, March 3, 2013

McConnell readying for tough re-election fight (The Arizona Republic)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, RSS and RSS Feed via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/288717062?client_source=feed&format=rss

Aurora shooting James Eagan Holmes jeremy lin Sage Stallone Mermaid Body Found Celeste Holm Stephen Covey

Analysis - Long haul ahead for Britain's struggling economy

LONDON (Reuters) - When the financial crisis began to spread five years ago, British coffee machine-maker Fracino raced to get ahead of it.

From the firm's base in Birmingham, it carved out new markets in the Middle East, Asia and even Italy for its cappuccino and espresso machines which it proudly stamps with the British flag.

Last year Fracino generated 25 percent of its turnover abroad, up from just 2 percent before the crisis.

That is the kind of transformation the Conservative-led government promised for the broader UK economy as it took office in 2010, after the near collapse of the country's huge banking sector and the plunge in housing prices.

But in the last few months, things have taken a worrying turn at Fracino. Clients at home and abroad have started to demand its cheaper machines, shunning the more expensive models and slowing the company's revenue growth.

"They are just buying the machines that will do the job," said managing director Adrian Maxwell.

"Until something happens for people to take their foot off the brake and feel a little bit more relaxed about spending again, it's long going to be a long, hard haul."

Nearly three years after Britain's Conservative-led government vowed to restore the country to financial health with a round of deep spending cuts, the economy looks stuck in a rut and could already be in its third recession since 2008.

Public debt is set to carry on rising for another three years, a blow to the ruling coalition facing parliamentary elections in 2015 and which has made austerity the centrepiece of its economic policy.

The creation of more than 1 million jobs in the last two years has surprised economists. But paltry wage growth for most wage-earners has been the price of higher employment.

And the ambitious-sounding plans of 2010 to rebalance the economy with a focus on exports as a new driver of growth have so far come to little, hampered by the economic crisis that has hammered Britain's main trading partners in Europe.

Even with a 20 percent slide in the value of the British pound since the onset of the financial crisis in 2007, Britain's share of world exports has fallen by about 6 percent since then, according to data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

"What is really striking about the UK is that it has had a quite important depreciation of the pound and still it hasn't had a big increase in exports," said Christophe Andre, an economist with the OECD.

Only Italy had worse overall growth among the industrialised Group of Seven nations in the same period, he said.

MOODY'S SEES SLOW GROWTH

The February 22 downgrade of Britain's triple-A rating underscored how long the economic gloom will probably last.

Moody's said it expected sluggish growth would stretch into the second half of the decade, offering the coalition government little hope of a pickup before the elections.

Forecasts used by the government predict the economy will grow by 1.2 percent in 2013 and 2 percent next year.

But estimates like that have routinely proven too optimistic. A year ago, the same official forecasters were predicting the economy would grow 2.7 percent in 2014.

A Reuters poll of private-sector economists last month predicted growth of 1.6 percent next year, better than the 1 percent growth forecast for the euro zone and only a touch slower than the forecast for Germany, but worse than the British government expects.

Some say the steady drip of weak economic data recently means Britain's outlook is deteriorating.

Not only did the economy shrink slightly in the last three months of 2012 but investment by businesses fell by 1.2 percent, a potential warning sign of more weakness to come. Factory activity shrank sharply in February, data showed on Friday.

"The optimistic view is that everything plays out nicely and we get back towards trend rates of growth. But there are structural factors pulling down on growth and they aren't going away," said Philip Rush, a UK economist with Nomura.

He thinks British gross domestic product will grow by just 0.4 percent this year by and 0.8 percent in 2014, held back in large part by the country's banking sector.

The fragile state of the country's banks mean many are too weak to resume significant amounts of new lending.

"Most people, when pushed, acknowledge that the problems in the financial sector aren't going away, but they are not factored in," Rush said.

LOOKING ABROAD FOR FUNDING

Getting a loan is something many UK businesses say remains far too hard, despite official programmes to boost lending such as the Bank of England's Funding for Lending scheme.

One of Britain's oldest manufacturing firms, Hayward Tyler Group, which makes specialist pumps and motors the size of small cars for use in power stations around the world, grew so frustrated with its bank last year it turned instead to a strategic investor in India. It provided the funding support needed for expansion in India's booming market and beyond.

Ewan Lloyd-Baker, chief executive of Hayward Tyler, said it was encouraging that manufacturing and exports were back on the political agenda, and an export credit guarantee scheme was starting to reach small companies. But the official programmes move too slowly to get lending flowing again.

"In our experience, you're lucky if it's months, and it's more likely to be years," he said.

Rather than attempt a U-turn and agree to a big increase in public spending, Prime Minister David Cameron and his chancellor George Osborne are sticking to the austerity plan.

Osborne is expected to offer only small growth measures in his next budget due on March 20 and resist calls to borrow more to fund new infrastructure. Business leaders want less spending on welfare to free up funds for projects such as house-building and road repairs which could give a quick boost to growth.

The hope for Cameron and Osborne is that voters in 2015 will continue to pin at least some blame for the weak economy on the opposition Labour party. It left the country with a record peacetime budget deficit when it lost the elections in 2010.

With little additional spending expected from the government, the Bank of England is bearing the weight of expectations that it can do more to prop up the recovery.

The 375 billion pounds it has already spent on government bonds is equivalent to 22 percent of the UK's gross domestic product, nearly double the same measure of the U.S. Federal Reserve's $2.5 trillion (1.66 trillion pounds) of bond-buying to date, according to a study by the conservative Centre for Policy Studies.

The prospect of more money-printing by the BoE - and signs that the central bank will tolerate the inflationary impact of a weak pound as a price to get Britain growing again - has helped push sterling to its lowest level against the dollar since mid-2010 and a 16-month low against the euro.

ENOUGH OF WAITING

With yields on 10-year government bonds hovering around 2 percent, less than inflation, some investors have had enough.

The Templeton Strategic Bond Fund focuses on UK clients but has sold all its British government gilts after its managers decided that they looked too expensive.

"We basically think that the UK will have slow to no growth over the next couple of years while it goes through this fiscal adjustment whereas we think that emerging markets offer much better opportunities," said David Zahn, the fund's manager.

Although the fund is small with 7 million pounds under management, the shift away from gilts was reflected in other, larger ones managed by the firm which is part of U.S. investment group Franklin Templeton, Zahn said.

Other investors are taking a more aggressive stance against Britain.

After mostly betting at the start of the year that the pound would rise in value, speculative investors have reversed positions sharply with most expecting it will fall, according to data from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Sterling could weaken as far as $1.40 from about $1.50 now, according to analysts at banks such as UBS and Commerzbank. Some fear a bigger fall that could push Britain's inflation higher.

It remains to be seen if weaker sterling will help bring about the long hoped-for rebalancing of the UK economy.

OECD economist Andre said Britain was simply not producing enough of what the world wants, especially developing countries hungry for the higher-end goods that represent the best hope for manufacturing in the more traditional economic powers.

Between 2005 and 2011, UK production of high-tech goods fell on average by 0.7 percent a year, contrasting with growth of 3.3 percent for the European Union as a whole, according to the European Union's statistics office.

The only other European countries to see a fall in high-tech production were Greece, Portugal and Italy.

"That really shows something about British competitiveness," said Andre.

(Additional reporting by David Milliken and Anirban Nag; Editing by Peter Graff)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/long-haul-ahead-britains-struggling-economy-100354400--business.html

dallas news dallas fort worth dfw 1930 census nike new nfl uniforms nfl uniforms andrew bailey

Saturday, March 2, 2013

How to Spot and Avoid Credit Repair Scams | Credit Karma Blog

March 1st, 2013

| | |

?

how to spot and avoid credit repair scams

As mentioned in an earlier blog post, next week is National Consumer Protection Week, a campaign that encourages consumers to take advantage of their rights and make better-informed decisions. In the spirit of NCPW, we here at the Credit Karma Blog will be writing a series of blog posts with handy tips on how you can protect yourself.

A few days ago, we covered several ways to keep your money safe. Today, we?re going to show you how to spot and avoid credit repair scams, which are unfortunately more prevalent than we?d like.

First off, let?s cover the basics.

What is a Credit Repair Scam?

Credit repair scams are programs that prey on those who are desperate for better credit by offering to fix and wipe credit reports clean of negative marks. They often do so by promising a ?new credit identity?. However, beware of these scams. There is never a ?quick fix? for repairing your credit.

Choosing credit repair assistance that turns out to be a scam will only worsen your financial situation. It?ll cost you money you don?t have, it?ll waste your time, and it won?t fix your credit.

How Can I Spot a Credit Repair Scam?

Credit repair scams are usually pretty easy to spot, once you know what to look for. Watch out for any of these red flags:

  1. They promise to remove all negative marks from your credit report. No one can legally remove accurate information from your credit report, even if a credit repair agency claims that you (or they) can. Accurate negative remarks will fall off your report after seven to ten years, but you can?t do anything to speed up the process.
  2. They insist to be paid before the services have been performed. The Credit Repair Organizations Act states that a credit repair company cannot ask you for payment until they?ve fulfilled their promise of service. Never give a credit repair service your money until they?ve accomplished what they?ve promised to do.
  3. They solicit you through email. Many unsolicited emails (whether they have to do with credit repair services or not) are fraudulent, so don?t take your chances. Just throw them away or mark them as spam.
  4. They tell you to create a new identity by applying for credit using a number other than your Social Security Number. Some organizations suggest doing this so you can create a new, clean credit file. However, this is not only illegal, but also impossible.
  5. They tell you not to contact any of the credit bureaus directly. You are entitled to receive copies of your credit report and are also entitled to dispute any errors yourself. Beware of anyone who tells you otherwise.
  6. They give you a vague contract to sign. Before you sign any contracts, read through the terms and conditions thoroughly and make sure the contract contains detailed information, like the name and business address of the organization, the amount you are being charged, the date by which the services will be performed, and how to cancel the contract. If it doesn?t contain that information, or if they ask you to sign a contract before giving you a copy to review, run far, far away!

How can I Avoid a Credit Repair Scam?

Simply put, the best way to avoid credit repair scams is to fix your credit yourself. There is legally nothing a credit repair company can do to improve your credit that you can?t do yourself.

When investigating your credit yourself, make sure you know your rights.

You are entitled to receive one free credit report every 12 months from each of the three major credit bureaus: Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion. Take advantage of this ability and pull your reports from AnnualCreditReport.com, the only government-approved site to get your reports for free.

In addition, you?re entitled to a report in the following situations:

  • If a company denies your application for credit, insurance, a loan, or employment. Contact the credit bureau that provided your report to the company within 60 days of receiving notice of the action.
  • If you?re unemployed and plan to seek employment within 60 days, if you?re on welfare, or if your report contains inaccuracies due to fraud, such as identity theft.

Once you?ve received your reports, review them carefully and dispute any errors.

Bottom Line: Not all credit repair agencies are scams, but be sure to do your research with the BBB, FTC, and your state attorney general before using a company?s credit repair services. Or, to be even safer, try repairing your credit yourself.

If you?ve already been a victim of a fraudulent credit repair service, report the abuse, especially if you?ve lost money due to credit repair fraud. Contact your local consumer affairs office or your state Attorney General to report the abuse.

Want more information? Check out the NCPW Consumer Topics. And stay tuned to the Credit Karma Blog for more on how to protect yourself.

Jenna

Jenna Lee helps manage the social media channels and blog at Credit Karma. Although her specialty lies in creating witty?post-it notes, she also enjoys sharing all the financial information she?s learned since joining Credit Karma in February 2012. When she?s not working, you can probably find her trying out a new dessert recipe or learning/perfecting any musical instrument she can get her hands on. She may or may not have created a Twitter specifically to put in this byline. Say ?hi? @leejennaa!

Follow Credit Karma!

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/CreditKarma

Twitter: http://twitter.com/creditkarma

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/creditkarma

Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+creditkarma/posts

Subscribe to the Credit Karma Blog

Source: http://blog.creditkarma.com/personal-finance/how-to-spot-and-avoid-credit-repair-scams/

ny jets the situation tim tebow jets katy perry part of me video photoshop cs6 beta cate blanchett nfl news